CBOE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 17.74% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 56.84%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 18.64% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $222.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $297.46 which suggests that it could grow by 67.97%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cboe Global Markets's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $196.5M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.51x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 18.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.30x versus 7.28x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 17.74% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 23.04%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 18.64% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.29%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $222.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $188.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.21%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.398%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $196.5M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $698M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.51x while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 32.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.30x versus 7.68x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 17.74% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 17.49%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 18.64% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $222.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $84.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.15%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.075%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $196.5M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $355M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.51x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 37.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.30x versus 5.64x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 17.74% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 24.5%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 18.64% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $222.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $593.53 which suggests that it could grow by 25.22%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.168%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 32.61% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $196.5M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $880M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.51x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 38.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.30x versus 10.41x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.