AIFU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baiyu Holdings has a net margin of -4.51% compared to AIFU's net margin of 9.52%. AIFU's return on equity of 12.88% beat Baiyu Holdings's return on equity of 2.72%.

AIFU has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4778.05%. On the other hand Baiyu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIFU has higher upside potential than Baiyu Holdings, analysts believe AIFU is more attractive than Baiyu Holdings.

AIFU has a beta of 0.063, which suggesting that the stock is 93.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baiyu Holdings has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.82%.

AIFU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baiyu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIFU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baiyu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIFU quarterly revenues are $83.8M, which are larger than Baiyu Holdings quarterly revenues of $37.2M. AIFU's net income of -$3.8M is lower than Baiyu Holdings's net income of $3.5M. Notably, AIFU's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.47x while Baiyu Holdings's PE ratio is 0.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIFU is 0.01x versus 0.04x for Baiyu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of -4.51% compared to AIFU's net margin of --. AIFU's return on equity of 12.88% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

AIFU has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4778.05%. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIFU has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe AIFU is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

AIFU has a beta of 0.063, which suggesting that the stock is 93.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AIFU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIFU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIFU quarterly revenues are $83.8M, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. AIFU's net income of -$3.8M is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, AIFU's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.47x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIFU is 0.01x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of -4.51% compared to AIFU's net margin of 9.91%. AIFU's return on equity of 12.88% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 10.78%.

AIFU has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4778.05%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.90 which suggests that it could grow by 44.57%. Given that AIFU has higher upside potential than LexinFintech Holdings, analysts believe AIFU is more attractive than LexinFintech Holdings.

AIFU has a beta of 0.063, which suggesting that the stock is 93.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.320, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.952%.

AIFU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AIFU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AIFU quarterly revenues are $83.8M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $508.5M. AIFU's net income of -$3.8M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $50.4M. Notably, AIFU's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.47x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 9.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIFU is 0.01x versus 0.71x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of -4.51% compared to AIFU's net margin of --. AIFU's return on equity of 12.88% beat The9's return on equity of --.

AIFU has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4778.05%. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIFU has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe AIFU is more attractive than The9.

AIFU has a beta of 0.063, which suggesting that the stock is 93.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 1.788, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.75%.

AIFU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIFU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIFU quarterly revenues are $83.8M, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. AIFU's net income of -$3.8M is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, AIFU's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.47x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIFU is 0.01x versus 2.29x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.