ALTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 1.18% compared to Altair Engineering's net margin of 19.59%. Altair Engineering's return on equity of 4.4% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48%.

Altair Engineering has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -3.88%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $320.54 which suggests that it could grow by 7.21%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Altair Engineering, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Altair Engineering.

Altair Engineering has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.11% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.6%.

Altair Engineering has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Altair Engineering pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Altair Engineering quarterly revenues are $151.5M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Altair Engineering's net income of $1.8M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M. Notably, Altair Engineering's price-to-earnings ratio is 268.90x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 78.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Altair Engineering is 14.69x versus 18.77x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 1.18% compared to Altair Engineering's net margin of 37.61%. Altair Engineering's return on equity of 4.4% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Altair Engineering has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -3.88%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.46 which suggests that it could grow by 21.37%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Altair Engineering, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Altair Engineering.

Altair Engineering has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.11% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.413%.

Altair Engineering has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Altair Engineering pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Altair Engineering quarterly revenues are $151.5M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Altair Engineering's net income of $1.8M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Altair Engineering's price-to-earnings ratio is 268.90x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 34.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Altair Engineering is 14.69x versus 12.31x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rapid7 has a net margin of 1.18% compared to Altair Engineering's net margin of 7.71%. Altair Engineering's return on equity of 4.4% beat Rapid7's return on equity of --.

Altair Engineering has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -3.88%. On the other hand Rapid7 has an analysts' consensus of $43.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.23%. Given that Rapid7 has higher upside potential than Altair Engineering, analysts believe Rapid7 is more attractive than Altair Engineering.

Altair Engineering has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.11% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rapid7 has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.204%.

Altair Engineering has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rapid7 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Altair Engineering pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rapid7 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Altair Engineering quarterly revenues are $151.5M, which are smaller than Rapid7 quarterly revenues of $214.7M. Altair Engineering's net income of $1.8M is lower than Rapid7's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Altair Engineering's price-to-earnings ratio is 268.90x while Rapid7's PE ratio is 61.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Altair Engineering is 14.69x versus 3.33x for Rapid7. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zuora has a net margin of 1.18% compared to Altair Engineering's net margin of -27.54%. Altair Engineering's return on equity of 4.4% beat Zuora's return on equity of -47.73%.

Altair Engineering has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -3.88%. On the other hand Zuora has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.4%. Given that Zuora has higher upside potential than Altair Engineering, analysts believe Zuora is more attractive than Altair Engineering.

Altair Engineering has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.11% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zuora has a beta of 1.666, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.594%.

Altair Engineering has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zuora offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Altair Engineering pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zuora pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Altair Engineering quarterly revenues are $151.5M, which are larger than Zuora quarterly revenues of $116.9M. Altair Engineering's net income of $1.8M is higher than Zuora's net income of -$32.2M. Notably, Altair Engineering's price-to-earnings ratio is 268.90x while Zuora's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Altair Engineering is 14.69x versus 3.26x for Zuora. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.