AMCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of 6.9% compared to AMC Networks's net margin of 2.04%. AMC Networks's return on equity of 2.79% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 4.66%.

AMC Networks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $122.66 which suggests that it could grow by 8.99%. Given that The Walt Disney has higher upside potential than AMC Networks, analysts believe The Walt Disney is more attractive than AMC Networks.

AMC Networks has a beta of 1.342, which suggesting that the stock is 34.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.18%.

AMC Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. AMC Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AMC Networks quarterly revenues are $599.6M, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $22.6B. AMC Networks's net income of $41.4M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $460M. Notably, AMC Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.16x while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 41.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMC Networks is 0.18x versus 2.25x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fox has a net margin of 6.9% compared to AMC Networks's net margin of 23.2%. AMC Networks's return on equity of 2.79% beat Fox's return on equity of 17.53%.

AMC Networks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Fox has an analysts' consensus of $47.91 which suggests that it could fall by -3.86%. Given that AMC Networks has higher upside potential than Fox, analysts believe AMC Networks is more attractive than Fox.

AMC Networks has a beta of 1.342, which suggesting that the stock is 34.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fox has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.067%.

AMC Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fox offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. AMC Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fox pays out 18.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Fox's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AMC Networks quarterly revenues are $599.6M, which are smaller than Fox quarterly revenues of $3.6B. AMC Networks's net income of $41.4M is lower than Fox's net income of $827M. Notably, AMC Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.16x while Fox's PE ratio is 12.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMC Networks is 0.18x versus 1.64x for Fox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of 6.9% compared to AMC Networks's net margin of -5.38%. AMC Networks's return on equity of 2.79% beat Gaia's return on equity of -6.96%.

AMC Networks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.49%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than AMC Networks, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than AMC Networks.

AMC Networks has a beta of 1.342, which suggesting that the stock is 34.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 0.623, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.665%.

AMC Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AMC Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AMC Networks quarterly revenues are $599.6M, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $22.2M. AMC Networks's net income of $41.4M is higher than Gaia's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, AMC Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.16x while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMC Networks is 0.18x versus 1.22x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 6.9% compared to AMC Networks's net margin of 0.02%. AMC Networks's return on equity of 2.79% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -26.78%.

AMC Networks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.77 which suggests that it could grow by 22.51%. Given that Paramount Global has higher upside potential than AMC Networks, analysts believe Paramount Global is more attractive than AMC Networks.

AMC Networks has a beta of 1.342, which suggesting that the stock is 34.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.201%.

AMC Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. AMC Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -73.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

AMC Networks quarterly revenues are $599.6M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $6.7B. AMC Networks's net income of $41.4M is higher than Paramount Global's net income of $1M. Notably, AMC Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.16x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMC Networks is 0.18x versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.