AQB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of 22.95%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Cal-Maine Foods's return on equity of 34.59%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Cal-Maine Foods has an analysts' consensus of $102.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.91%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Cal-Maine Foods, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Cal-Maine Foods.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.178, which suggesting that the stock is 17.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of -0.120, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.965%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cal-Maine Foods offers a yield of 4.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.49 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 33.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Cal-Maine Foods quarterly revenues of $954.7M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Cal-Maine Foods's net income of $219.1M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cal-Maine Foods's PE ratio is 6.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 1.75x versus 1.41x for Cal-Maine Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limoneira has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -8.96%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Limoneira's return on equity of 4.11%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Limoneira has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.53%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Limoneira, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Limoneira.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.178, which suggesting that the stock is 17.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limoneira has a beta of 0.458, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.173%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limoneira offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira pays out 76.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Limoneira quarterly revenues of $34.3M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Limoneira's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limoneira's PE ratio is 42.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 1.75x versus 1.69x for Limoneira. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&W Seed has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -32.71%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat S&W Seed's return on equity of -85.86%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand S&W Seed has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 330.5%. Given that S&W Seed has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, analysts believe S&W Seed is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.178, which suggesting that the stock is 17.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&W Seed has a beta of 1.880, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.004%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. S&W Seed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. S&W Seed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than S&W Seed quarterly revenues of $5.1M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is lower than S&W Seed's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while S&W Seed's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 1.75x versus 0.40x for S&W Seed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Village Farms International has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -10.45%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Village Farms International's return on equity of -12.25%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Village Farms International has an analysts' consensus of $1.88 which suggests that it could grow by 167.86%. Given that Village Farms International has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, analysts believe Village Farms International is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.178, which suggesting that the stock is 17.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Village Farms International has a beta of 2.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.693%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Village Farms International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Village Farms International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Village Farms International quarterly revenues of $82.6M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is higher than Village Farms International's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Village Farms International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 1.75x versus 0.23x for Village Farms International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.