AVAV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 8.61%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $203.94, signalling upside risk potential of 73.43%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.05%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than General Dynamics.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.65x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 4.46x versus 1.58x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 6.85%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $203.94, signalling upside risk potential of 73.43%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $143.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.06%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than RTX.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.65x while RTX's PE ratio is 36.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 4.46x versus 2.17x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe Pro Group has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of -371.8%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat Safe Pro Group's return on equity of --.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $203.94, signalling upside risk potential of 73.43%. On the other hand Safe Pro Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Safe Pro Group, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Safe Pro Group.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe Pro Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe Pro Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe Pro Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are larger than Safe Pro Group quarterly revenues of $307.7K. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Safe Pro Group's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.65x while Safe Pro Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 4.46x versus 15.12x for Safe Pro Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 4.63%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $203.94, signalling upside risk potential of 73.43%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.22 which suggests that it could fall by -12.21%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Triumph Group.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.942%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $315.6M. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.65x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 3.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 4.46x versus 1.58x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.