BHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lincoln National has a net margin of 62.3% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 33.18%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $59.33, signalling upside risk potential of 3.01%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $36.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.08%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.054%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.16x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 1.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.32x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of 62.3% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 5.17%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05% beat MetLife's return on equity of 15.75%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $59.33, signalling upside risk potential of 3.01%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $90.64 which suggests that it could grow by 17.1%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.655%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M is lower than MetLife's net income of $945M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.16x while MetLife's PE ratio is 12.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.75x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial has a net margin of 62.3% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 5.22%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05% beat Prudential Financial's return on equity of 7.43%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $59.33, signalling upside risk potential of 3.01%. On the other hand Prudential Financial has an analysts' consensus of $113.43 which suggests that it could grow by 10.48%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.503%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prudential Financial offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial quarterly revenues of $13.5B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M is lower than Prudential Financial's net income of $707M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.16x while Prudential Financial's PE ratio is 16.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.61x for Prudential Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 62.3% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 5.86%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 14.62%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $59.33, signalling upside risk potential of 3.01%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.08 which suggests that it could grow by 18.33%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.843%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M is higher than Unum Group's net income of $189.1M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.16x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 1.13x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.