CCOI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Altice USA has a net margin of -17.17% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of -2.42%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -49.24% beat Altice USA's return on equity of --.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $80.91, signalling upside risk potential of 50.31%. On the other hand Altice USA has an analysts' consensus of $2.84 which suggests that it could grow by 15.97%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than Altice USA, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than Altice USA.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altice USA has a beta of 1.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.585%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.36%. Altice USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Altice USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $252.3M, which are smaller than Altice USA quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$43.3M is higher than Altice USA's net income of -$54.1M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.90x while Altice USA's PE ratio is 203.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 2.47x versus 0.13x for Altice USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cable One has a net margin of -17.17% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of -27.18%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -49.24% beat Cable One's return on equity of 0.77%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $80.91, signalling upside risk potential of 50.31%. On the other hand Cable One has an analysts' consensus of $395.50 which suggests that it could grow by 48.89%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than Cable One, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than Cable One.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cable One has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.942%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.36%. Cable One offers a yield of 4.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.95 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Cable One pays out 468.94% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $252.3M, which are smaller than Cable One quarterly revenues of $387.2M. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$43.3M is higher than Cable One's net income of -$105.2M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.90x while Cable One's PE ratio is 139.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 2.47x versus 1.02x for Cable One. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDT has a net margin of -17.17% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of 6.68%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -49.24% beat IDT's return on equity of 30.53%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $80.91, signalling upside risk potential of 50.31%. On the other hand IDT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 59.11%. Given that IDT has higher upside potential than Cogent Communications Holdings, analysts believe IDT is more attractive than Cogent Communications Holdings.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDT has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.286%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.36%. IDT offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT pays out 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $252.3M, which are smaller than IDT quarterly revenues of $303.3M. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$43.3M is lower than IDT's net income of $20.3M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.90x while IDT's PE ratio is 15.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 2.47x versus 1.01x for IDT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of -17.17% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of 2.55%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -49.24% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -12.54%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $80.91, signalling upside risk potential of 50.31%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $5.05 which suggests that it could grow by 34.18%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.802%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.36%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $252.3M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$43.3M is lower than Lumen Technologies's net income of $85M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.90x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 2.47x versus 0.28x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.