CEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Exelon has a net margin of 15.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 13.52%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68% beat Exelon's return on equity of 10.16%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $280.74, signalling upside risk potential of 13.08%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $47.53 which suggests that it could grow by 3.33%. Given that Constellation Energy has higher upside potential than Exelon, analysts believe Constellation Energy is more attractive than Exelon.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.261%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Exelon offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Constellation Energy's net income of $852M is lower than Exelon's net income of $908M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.88x while Exelon's PE ratio is 17.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 3.33x versus 1.95x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 15.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 13.33%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 9.2%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $280.74, signalling upside risk potential of 13.08%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $81.95 which suggests that it could grow by 23.98%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.565%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Constellation Energy's net income of $852M is higher than NextEra Energy's net income of $833M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.88x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 24.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 3.33x versus 5.39x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 15.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 16.8%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 29.37%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $280.74, signalling upside risk potential of 13.08%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $256.29 which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $488M. Constellation Energy's net income of $852M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $82M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.88x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 19.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 3.33x versus 5.94x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 15.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 10.92%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68% beat Vistra's return on equity of 38.93%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $280.74, signalling upside risk potential of 13.08%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $163.61 which suggests that it could grow by 16.87%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.258%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $4B. Constellation Energy's net income of $852M is higher than Vistra's net income of $441M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.88x while Vistra's PE ratio is 19.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 3.33x versus 2.85x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.