CPSH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

inTest has a net margin of -16.77% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of 4.11%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.92%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $12.67 which suggests that it could grow by 116.16%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.700, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.048%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $36.6M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K is lower than inTest's net income of $1.5M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while inTest's PE ratio is 25.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.00x versus 0.55x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of -16.77% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of 11.08%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.3%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.692%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K is lower than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while LGL Group's PE ratio is 90.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.00x versus 16.58x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerson Radio has a net margin of -16.77% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -13.17%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34% beat Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.82%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Emerson Radio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1149.38%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.332, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.785%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emerson Radio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Radio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Emerson Radio quarterly revenues of $4M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K is lower than Emerson Radio's net income of -$527K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Emerson Radio's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.00x versus 0.76x for Emerson Radio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -16.77% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -105.32%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1636.11%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 392.029%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.00x versus 0.11x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.