CROX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nike has a net margin of 17.08% compared to Crocs's net margin of 7.05%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.54% beat Nike's return on equity of 31.91%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $127.47, signalling upside risk potential of 6%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $73.58 which suggests that it could grow by 17.94%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.457, which suggesting that the stock is 45.664% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.917%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $937.3M, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.3B. Crocs's net income of $160.1M is lower than Nike's net income of $794M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Nike's PE ratio is 20.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.72x versus 1.95x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steven Madden has a net margin of 17.08% compared to Crocs's net margin of 7.3%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.54% beat Steven Madden's return on equity of 19.22%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $127.47, signalling upside risk potential of 6%. On the other hand Steven Madden has an analysts' consensus of $26.78 which suggests that it could grow by 0.1%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Steven Madden, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Steven Madden.

Crocs has a beta of 1.457, which suggesting that the stock is 45.664% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.503%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steven Madden offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden pays out 36.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $937.3M, which are larger than Steven Madden quarterly revenues of $553.5M. Crocs's net income of $160.1M is higher than Steven Madden's net income of $40.4M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Steven Madden's PE ratio is 11.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.72x versus 0.84x for Steven Madden. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 17.08% compared to Crocs's net margin of 8.39%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.54% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.25%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $127.47, signalling upside risk potential of 6%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $63.16 which suggests that it could grow by 1.46%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Skechers USA, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Skechers USA.

Crocs has a beta of 1.457, which suggesting that the stock is 45.664% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.319%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $937.3M, which are smaller than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Crocs's net income of $160.1M is lower than Skechers USA's net income of $202.4M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 14.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.72x versus 1.04x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 17.08% compared to Crocs's net margin of 2.69%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.54% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 25.09%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $127.47, signalling upside risk potential of 6%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $20.78 which suggests that it could grow by 23.16%. Given that Wolverine World Wide has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Wolverine World Wide is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.457, which suggesting that the stock is 45.664% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.618, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.762%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out 67.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $937.3M, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $412.3M. Crocs's net income of $160.1M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $11.1M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is 19.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.72x versus 0.76x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.