CROX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mattel has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Crocs's net margin of 20.2%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.71% beat Mattel's return on equity of 26.12%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $135.52, signalling upside risk potential of 22.31%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.08 which suggests that it could grow by 34.23%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.953, which suggesting that the stock is 95.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.641%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Crocs's net income of $199.8M is lower than Mattel's net income of $372.4M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.03x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.65x versus 1.16x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Crocs's net margin of 9.41%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.71% beat Nike's return on equity of 34.51%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $135.52, signalling upside risk potential of 22.31%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $86.30 which suggests that it could grow by 17.72%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Nike.

Crocs has a beta of 1.953, which suggesting that the stock is 95.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.588%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Crocs's net income of $199.8M is lower than Nike's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.03x while Nike's PE ratio is 22.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.65x versus 2.26x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steven Madden has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Crocs's net margin of 8.85%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.71% beat Steven Madden's return on equity of 20.11%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $135.52, signalling upside risk potential of 22.31%. On the other hand Steven Madden has an analysts' consensus of $44.70 which suggests that it could grow by 11.35%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Steven Madden, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Steven Madden.

Crocs has a beta of 1.953, which suggesting that the stock is 95.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.098%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steven Madden offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden pays out 36.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Steven Madden quarterly revenues of $624.7M. Crocs's net income of $199.8M is higher than Steven Madden's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.03x while Steven Madden's PE ratio is 17.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.65x versus 1.37x for Steven Madden. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Crocs's net margin of 5.36%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.71% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $135.52, signalling upside risk potential of 22.31%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $9.83 which suggests that it could grow by 11.56%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

Crocs has a beta of 1.953, which suggesting that the stock is 95.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.883, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.326%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $440.2M. Crocs's net income of $199.8M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.03x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.65x versus 1.00x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.