CRUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 30.77%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 18.01% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of $134.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.95%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $237.42 which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than Broadcom.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.259%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $541.9M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Cirrus Logic's net income of $102.1M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 189.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 2.94x versus 21.37x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 9.01%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 18.01% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 14.83%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of $134.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.95%. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $53.56 which suggests that it could grow by 20.46%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than FormFactor, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than FormFactor.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.876%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $541.9M, which are larger than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $207.9M. Cirrus Logic's net income of $102.1M is higher than FormFactor's net income of $18.7M. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while FormFactor's PE ratio is 25.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 2.94x versus 4.71x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 55.04%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 18.01% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of $134.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.95%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.38 which suggests that it could grow by 24.94%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.285%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $541.9M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Cirrus Logic's net income of $102.1M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 54.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 2.94x versus 30.36x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyworks Solutions has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 5.9%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 18.01% beat Skyworks Solutions's return on equity of 9.51%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of $134.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.95%. On the other hand Skyworks Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $94.78 which suggests that it could grow by 7.16%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than Skyworks Solutions, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than Skyworks Solutions.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyworks Solutions has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.064%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyworks Solutions offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skyworks Solutions pays out 73.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyworks Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $541.9M, which are smaller than Skyworks Solutions quarterly revenues of $1B. Cirrus Logic's net income of $102.1M is higher than Skyworks Solutions's net income of $60.5M. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while Skyworks Solutions's PE ratio is 23.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 2.94x versus 3.42x for Skyworks Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.