CRWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CyberArk Software has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of -30.89%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat CyberArk Software's return on equity of -7.65%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $410.19, signalling upside risk potential of 27.43%. On the other hand CyberArk Software has an analysts' consensus of $444.42 which suggests that it could grow by 45.02%. Given that CyberArk Software has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe CyberArk Software is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CyberArk Software has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.379%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CyberArk Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CyberArk Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than CyberArk Software quarterly revenues of $314.4M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is higher than CyberArk Software's net income of -$97.1M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while CyberArk Software's PE ratio is 1,479.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 20.21x versus 14.26x for CyberArk Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 34.62%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $410.19, signalling upside risk potential of 27.43%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $503.37 which suggests that it could grow by 40.03%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 28.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 20.21x versus 10.27x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of -2.79%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -8.83%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $410.19, signalling upside risk potential of 27.43%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $141.52 which suggests that it could grow by 45.78%. Given that Cloudflare has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Cloudflare is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.303%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $459.9M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Cloudflare's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 20.21x versus 19.85x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 3.37%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Okta's return on equity of 0.46%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $410.19, signalling upside risk potential of 27.43%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $117.29 which suggests that it could grow by 27.58%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.826%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $682M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Okta's net income of $23M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Okta's PE ratio is 2,298.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 20.21x versus 6.20x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.