CSTE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of -24.88% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of 16.92%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -14.05% beat Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.4%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 82.48%. On the other hand Armstrong World Industries has an analysts' consensus of $164.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.25%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.668%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Armstrong World Industries offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $97.9M, which are smaller than Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues of $367.7M. Caesarstone's net income of -$24.3M is lower than Armstrong World Industries's net income of $62.2M. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Armstrong World Industries's PE ratio is 23.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.21x versus 4.29x for Armstrong World Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Identiv has a net margin of -24.88% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -5.3%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -14.05% beat Identiv's return on equity of 71.9%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 82.48%. On the other hand Identiv has an analysts' consensus of $6.83 which suggests that it could grow by 107.7%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Caesarstone, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Caesarstone.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Identiv has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.932%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Identiv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Identiv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $97.9M, which are larger than Identiv quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Caesarstone's net income of -$24.3M is lower than Identiv's net income of -$355K. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Identiv's PE ratio is 1.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.21x versus 1.83x for Identiv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -24.88% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -1.56%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -14.05% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -49.21%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 82.48%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.35%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $97.9M, which are smaller than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Caesarstone's net income of -$24.3M is lower than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.21x versus 0.17x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.