DXLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nordstrom has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Destination XL Group's net margin of 1.33%. Destination XL Group's return on equity of 6.36% beat Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.24%.

Destination XL Group has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.14%. On the other hand Nordstrom has an analysts' consensus of $22.73 which suggests that it could fall by -6.13%. Given that Nordstrom has more downside risk than Destination XL Group, analysts believe Destination XL Group is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Destination XL Group has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordstrom has a beta of 2.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.165%.

Destination XL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordstrom offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Destination XL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom pays out 91.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Destination XL Group quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Nordstrom quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Nordstrom's net income of $46M. Notably, Destination XL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.73x while Nordstrom's PE ratio is 15.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Destination XL Group is 0.35x versus 0.27x for Nordstrom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lands' End has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Destination XL Group's net margin of -0.19%. Destination XL Group's return on equity of 6.36% beat Lands' End's return on equity of -8.88%.

Destination XL Group has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.14%. On the other hand Lands' End has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.79%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Destination XL Group, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Destination XL Group.

Destination XL Group has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lands' End has a beta of 2.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.865%.

Destination XL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lands' End offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Destination XL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lands' End pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Destination XL Group quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Lands' End quarterly revenues of $318.6M. Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Lands' End's net income of -$593K. Notably, Destination XL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.73x while Lands' End's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Destination XL Group is 0.35x versus 0.29x for Lands' End. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Destination XL Group's net margin of 9.64%. Destination XL Group's return on equity of 6.36% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 42.62%.

Destination XL Group has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.14%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $161.73 which suggests that it could grow by 10.49%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Destination XL Group, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Destination XL Group.

Destination XL Group has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.501%.

Destination XL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Destination XL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Destination XL Group quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $488.8M. Notably, Destination XL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.73x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 24.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Destination XL Group is 0.35x versus 2.40x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Destination XL Group's net margin of 7.56%. Destination XL Group's return on equity of 6.36% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Destination XL Group has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.14%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could fall by -15.99%. Given that Urban Outfitters has more downside risk than Destination XL Group, analysts believe Destination XL Group is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Destination XL Group has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.524%.

Destination XL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Destination XL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Destination XL Group quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Destination XL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.73x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Destination XL Group is 0.35x versus 0.98x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.