ERII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 2.87%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 8.96% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 15.25%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $20.25, signalling upside risk potential of 40.3%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.16%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.385, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.536%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $38.6M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $348.2M. Energy Recovery's net income of $8.5M is lower than Mueller Water Products's net income of $10M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.50x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 30.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.31x versus 2.64x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tennant has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 6.59%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 8.96% beat Tennant's return on equity of 17.93%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $20.25, signalling upside risk potential of 40.3%. On the other hand Tennant has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 59.98%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Energy Recovery, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Energy Recovery.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tennant has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.86900000000001%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tennant offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant pays out 18.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $38.6M, which are smaller than Tennant quarterly revenues of $315.8M. Energy Recovery's net income of $8.5M is lower than Tennant's net income of $20.8M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.50x while Tennant's PE ratio is 14.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.31x versus 1.20x for Tennant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 12.71%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 8.96% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $20.25, signalling upside risk potential of 40.3%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $210.33 which suggests that it could grow by 4.3%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.626%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $38.6M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $543.6M. Energy Recovery's net income of $8.5M is lower than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.50x while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 24.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.31x versus 2.99x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 10.31%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 8.96% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.1%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $20.25, signalling upside risk potential of 40.3%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $146.95 which suggests that it could grow by 26.78%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Xylem, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Xylem.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.481%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $38.6M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Energy Recovery's net income of $8.5M is lower than Xylem's net income of $217M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.50x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 6.31x versus 3.35x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.