FKWL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ciena has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Franklin Wireless's net margin of 3.29%. Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -8.33% beat Ciena's return on equity of 2.92%.

Franklin Wireless has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 254.77%. On the other hand Ciena has an analysts' consensus of $87.93 which suggests that it could grow by 0%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Ciena, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Ciena.

Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.209, which suggesting that the stock is 79.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ciena has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.823%.

Franklin Wireless has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ciena offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Wireless pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ciena pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than Ciena quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Franklin Wireless's net income of $515.2K is lower than Ciena's net income of $37M. Notably, Franklin Wireless's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ciena's PE ratio is 154.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Wireless is 1.54x versus 3.19x for Ciena. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clearfield has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Franklin Wireless's net margin of -1.77%. Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -8.33% beat Clearfield's return on equity of -4.31%.

Franklin Wireless has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 254.77%. On the other hand Clearfield has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.82%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Clearfield, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Clearfield.

Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.209, which suggesting that the stock is 79.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearfield has a beta of 1.280, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.037%.

Franklin Wireless has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clearfield offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Wireless pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clearfield pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than Clearfield quarterly revenues of $46.8M. Franklin Wireless's net income of $515.2K is higher than Clearfield's net income of -$827K. Notably, Franklin Wireless's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clearfield's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Wireless is 1.54x versus 2.74x for Clearfield. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netgear has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Franklin Wireless's net margin of 46.53%. Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -8.33% beat Netgear's return on equity of 3.78%.

Franklin Wireless has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 254.77%. On the other hand Netgear has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -22.51%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Netgear, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Netgear.

Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.209, which suggesting that the stock is 79.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netgear has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.796%.

Franklin Wireless has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netgear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Wireless pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netgear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than Netgear quarterly revenues of $182.9M. Franklin Wireless's net income of $515.2K is lower than Netgear's net income of $85.1M. Notably, Franklin Wireless's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netgear's PE ratio is 43.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Wireless is 1.54x versus 1.22x for Netgear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westell Technologies has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Franklin Wireless's net margin of --. Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -8.33% beat Westell Technologies's return on equity of --.

Franklin Wireless has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 254.77%. On the other hand Westell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Westell Technologies, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Westell Technologies.

Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.209, which suggesting that the stock is 79.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westell Technologies has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.065%.

Franklin Wireless has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Westell Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Wireless pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Westell Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are larger than Westell Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Wireless's net income of $515.2K is higher than Westell Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Wireless's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Westell Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Wireless is 1.54x versus 0.48x for Westell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.