FULT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 31.58%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.06%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.67%. Given that Fulton Financial has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Fulton Financial is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.794, which suggesting that the stock is 20.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.076%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 2.96x versus 3.04x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 16.32%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.06%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 19.65%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Fulton Financial, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Fulton Financial.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.794, which suggesting that the stock is 20.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 2.96x versus 2.76x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 27.77%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.06%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.02%. Given that Fulton Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Fulton Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.794, which suggesting that the stock is 20.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Park National offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 2.96x versus 5.58x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regions Financial has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 27.37%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.1%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.06%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $27.62 which suggests that it could grow by 15.95%. Given that Fulton Financial has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Fulton Financial is more attractive than Regions Financial.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.794, which suggesting that the stock is 20.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.381%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 42.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $490M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 13.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 2.96x versus 3.11x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.