Financhill
Buy
57

GDYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$13.95
Seasonality move :
7.53%
Day range:
$13.60 - $13.97
52-week range:
$9.07 - $25.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
349.00x
P/S ratio:
3.21x
P/B ratio:
2.26x
Volume:
278.9K
Avg. volume:
700.6K
1-year change:
40.44%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$350.6M
EPS (TTM):
$0.04

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
$98.4M $0.09 23.02% 148.45% $19.25
AMZE
Amaze Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
ASGN
ASGN
$966M $0.95 -3.87% 6.25% $61.83
CTM
Castellum
$10M -$0.01 -- -- $3.00
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
$844.1M $0.40 -5.52% 46.53% $72.33
EPAM
EPAM Systems
$1.3B $2.27 10.16% 16.07% $227.49
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
$13.96 $19.25 $1.2B 349.00x $0.00 0% 3.21x
AMZE
Amaze Holdings
$0.50 -- $8.5M -- $0.00 0% 26.94x
ASGN
ASGN
$51.37 $61.83 $2.3B 14.64x $0.00 0% 0.58x
CTM
Castellum
$1.01 $3.00 $81.2M -- $0.00 0% 1.27x
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
$43.78 $72.33 $1.6B 356.62x $0.00 0% 0.44x
EPAM
EPAM Systems
$159.12 $227.49 $9.1B 20.30x $0.00 0% 1.95x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
-- 1.935 -- 7.27x
AMZE
Amaze Holdings
-- 2.608 -- --
ASGN
ASGN
-- 0.981 -- 2.45x
CTM
Castellum
34.01% -20.807 6.75% 1.81x
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
49.94% 1.380 57.05% 0.71x
EPAM
EPAM Systems
0.69% 2.268 0.19% 2.79x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
$37M $1.3M 0.98% 0.98% 1.26% $4.4M
AMZE
Amaze Holdings
-- -- -- -- -- --
ASGN
ASGN
$275.4M $46.6M 6.01% 8.76% 4.81% $16.8M
CTM
Castellum
$4.1M -$1.6M -40.39% -71.22% -30.39% -$394.4K
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
$231.6M $42.5M -0.78% -1.61% 4.17% $186.2M
EPAM
EPAM Systems
$380M $136.5M 12.87% 12.96% 10.94% $114.5M

Grid Dynamics Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or AMZE?

    Amaze Holdings has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of --. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat Amaze Holdings's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    AMZE
    Amaze Holdings
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or AMZE?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.25, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand Amaze Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    AMZE
    Amaze Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is GDYN or AMZE More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or AMZE?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amaze Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amaze Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or AMZE?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are larger than Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is higher than Amaze Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 349.00x while Amaze Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.21x versus 26.94x for Amaze Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.21x 349.00x $100.3M $4.5M
    AMZE
    Amaze Holdings
    26.94x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or ASGN?

    ASGN has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 2.16%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat ASGN's return on equity of 8.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    ASGN
    ASGN
    28.44% $0.48 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or ASGN?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.25, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand ASGN has an analysts' consensus of $61.83 which suggests that it could grow by 20.37%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than ASGN, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than ASGN.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    ASGN
    ASGN
    2 3 1
  • Is GDYN or ASGN More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ASGN has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.048%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or ASGN?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ASGN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASGN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or ASGN?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are smaller than ASGN quarterly revenues of $968.3M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is lower than ASGN's net income of $20.9M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 349.00x while ASGN's PE ratio is 14.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.21x versus 0.58x for ASGN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.21x 349.00x $100.3M $4.5M
    ASGN
    ASGN
    0.58x 14.64x $968.3M $20.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or CTM?

    Castellum has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of -26.62%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    CTM
    Castellum
    40% -$0.05 $30.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or CTM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.25, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 197.03%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    CTM
    Castellum
    0 0 0
  • Is GDYN or CTM More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 488.969%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or CTM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or CTM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 349.00x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.21x versus 1.27x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.21x 349.00x $100.3M $4.5M
    CTM
    Castellum
    1.27x -- $10.3M -$2.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or DBD?

    Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 0.57%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    DBD
    Diebold Nixdorf
    23.42% $0.15 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or DBD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.25, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand Diebold Nixdorf has an analysts' consensus of $72.33 which suggests that it could grow by 65.22%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    DBD
    Diebold Nixdorf
    2 0 0
  • Is GDYN or DBD More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or DBD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diebold Nixdorf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diebold Nixdorf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or DBD?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are smaller than Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues of $988.9M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is lower than Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 349.00x while Diebold Nixdorf's PE ratio is 356.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.21x versus 0.44x for Diebold Nixdorf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.21x 349.00x $100.3M $4.5M
    DBD
    Diebold Nixdorf
    0.44x 356.62x $988.9M $5.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns GDYN or EPAM?

    EPAM Systems has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 8.28%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98% beat EPAM Systems's return on equity of 12.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    36.94% $0.05 $517.8M
    EPAM
    EPAM Systems
    30.44% $1.80 $3.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About GDYN or EPAM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.25, signalling upside risk potential of 37.89%. On the other hand EPAM Systems has an analysts' consensus of $227.49 which suggests that it could grow by 42.97%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3 0 0
    EPAM
    EPAM Systems
    7 7 0
  • Is GDYN or EPAM More Risky?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.742%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDYN or EPAM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GDYN or EPAM?

    Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.3M, which are smaller than EPAM Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M is lower than EPAM Systems's net income of $103.3M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 349.00x while EPAM Systems's PE ratio is 20.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.21x versus 1.95x for EPAM Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GDYN
    Grid Dynamics Holdings
    3.21x 349.00x $100.3M $4.5M
    EPAM
    EPAM Systems
    1.95x 20.30x $1.2B $103.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is Chewy Stock Up — And Will It Keep Climbing?
Why Is Chewy Stock Up — And Will It Keep Climbing?

We are all witnesses to the crazy e-commerce industry boom…

Is Netflix a Must-own Stock?
Is Netflix a Must-own Stock?

The early months of 2025 have been very hard on…

Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?
Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?

In February, Pershing Square manager Bill Ackman revealed that his…

Stock Ideas

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Sell
27
SAIA alert for Apr 26

Saia [SAIA] is down 30.77% over the past day.

Sell
48
APPF alert for Apr 26

AppFolio [APPF] is down 18.16% over the past day.

Sell
15
KNSL alert for Apr 26

Kinsale Capital Group [KNSL] is down 16.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock