GWAV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Distribution Solutions Group has a net margin of -56.41% compared to Greenwave Technology Solutions's net margin of 4.68%. Greenwave Technology Solutions's return on equity of -44.78% beat Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.34%.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Distribution Solutions Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.88%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than Greenwave Technology Solutions, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than Greenwave Technology Solutions.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.432%.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Distribution Solutions Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenwave Technology Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Distribution Solutions Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenwave Technology Solutions quarterly revenues are $8.5M, which are smaller than Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues of $468M. Greenwave Technology Solutions's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Greenwave Technology Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Distribution Solutions Group's PE ratio is 1,694.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenwave Technology Solutions is 0.07x versus 0.93x for Distribution Solutions Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of -56.41% compared to Greenwave Technology Solutions's net margin of 4.46%. Greenwave Technology Solutions's return on equity of -44.78% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 17.08%.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -29.41%. Given that DXP Enterprises has higher upside potential than Greenwave Technology Solutions, analysts believe DXP Enterprises is more attractive than Greenwave Technology Solutions.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.007%.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenwave Technology Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenwave Technology Solutions quarterly revenues are $8.5M, which are smaller than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $472.9M. Greenwave Technology Solutions's net income of -$4.8M is lower than DXP Enterprises's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Greenwave Technology Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 27.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenwave Technology Solutions is 0.07x versus 1.03x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries has a net margin of -56.41% compared to Greenwave Technology Solutions's net margin of 3.45%. Greenwave Technology Solutions's return on equity of -44.78% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenwave Technology Solutions has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Greenwave Technology Solutions is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.521%.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Greenwave Technology Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenwave Technology Solutions quarterly revenues are $8.5M, which are smaller than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.6M. Greenwave Technology Solutions's net income of -$4.8M is lower than EVI Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Greenwave Technology Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 35.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenwave Technology Solutions is 0.07x versus 0.64x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of -56.41% compared to Greenwave Technology Solutions's net margin of 26.12%. Greenwave Technology Solutions's return on equity of -44.78% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12%.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.78%. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than Greenwave Technology Solutions, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than Greenwave Technology Solutions.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.786%.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenwave Technology Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenwave Technology Solutions quarterly revenues are $8.5M, which are smaller than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $137.5M. Greenwave Technology Solutions's net income of -$4.8M is lower than L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M. Notably, Greenwave Technology Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 7.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenwave Technology Solutions is 0.07x versus 0.58x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.