HLIT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airgain has a net margin of 17.16% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -13.02%. Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19% beat Airgain's return on equity of -27.97%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.26%. On the other hand Airgain has an analysts' consensus of $8.67 which suggests that it could grow by 137.44%. Given that Airgain has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Airgain is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airgain has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.364%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Airgain offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Airgain pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $222.2M, which are larger than Airgain quarterly revenues of $15.1M. Harmonic's net income of $38.1M is higher than Airgain's net income of -$2M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.36x while Airgain's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.65x versus 0.67x for Airgain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BK Technologies has a net margin of 17.16% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 20.4%. Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 34.24%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.26%. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.63%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than BK Technologies.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.302%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $222.2M, which are larger than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $17.9M. Harmonic's net income of $38.1M is higher than BK Technologies's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.36x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.65x versus 2.14x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 17.16% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -38.51%. Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -65.2%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.26%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 206.75%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.931%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $222.2M, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.6M. Harmonic's net income of $38.1M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of -$48.7M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.36x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.65x versus 0.10x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorola Solutions has a net margin of 17.16% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 20.29%. Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19% beat Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 153.02%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.26%. On the other hand Motorola Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $518.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.45%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.134%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorola Solutions offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions pays out 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $222.2M, which are smaller than Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues of $3B. Harmonic's net income of $38.1M is lower than Motorola Solutions's net income of $611M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.36x while Motorola Solutions's PE ratio is 47.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.65x versus 6.86x for Motorola Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.