How High Will Bloom Energy Stock Go?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) has seen its shares surge by more…
Buy
57
IAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.98
Seasonality move
:
-6.71%
Day range:
$8.03 - $8.32
52-week range:
$6.26 - $13.62
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
27.90x
P/S ratio:
2.44x
P/B ratio:
1.29x
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-30.08%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$530.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.29
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$129.3M | $0.14 | 10.98% | 254.8% | $13.39 |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$5.5M | $0.13 | -15.04% | -- | $14.00 |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LDWY
Lendway
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$11.9M | -$0.02 | 1.62% | -33.33% | $4.00 |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$34.3M | -$0.24 | 8.53% | -- | $7.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$8.09 | $13.39 | $1.3B | 27.90x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.44x |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$8.84 | $14.00 | $33.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.47x |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
$0.0014 | -- | $614.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.24x |
|
LDWY
Lendway
|
$4.35 | -- | $7.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.20x |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$1.50 | $4.00 | $65.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.49x |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$5.12 | $7.50 | $482.8M | 2.57x | $0.03 | 0.59% | 2.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
1.36% | 1.389 | 1.08% | 3.32x |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
38.71% | 0.965 | 46.42% | 0.58x |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
63.73% | 3.255 | 99.67% | 1.31x |
|
LDWY
Lendway
|
75.23% | -0.057 | 443.49% | 0.40x |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
-- | 1.983 | -- | 2.14x |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
-- | 1.407 | -- | 2.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$103.9M | $9.5M | 4.5% | 4.8% | 8.54% | -$7.4M |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$1.3M | -$2.6M | -21.1% | -32.41% | -1137.6% | $806K |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
$11.3K | -$147.8K | -3.23% | -8.01% | -733.23% | -$102.8K |
|
LDWY
Lendway
|
$1.4M | -$1.4M | -8.6% | -20.1% | -20.38% | -$7.8M |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$7.5M | -$1.6M | -14.38% | -14.38% | -13.31% | $710K |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$10.1M | -$23.9M | -4.58% | -4.67% | -87.39% | $5.3M |
Integral Ad Science Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or ACCS?
ACCESS Newswire has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -700.69%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat ACCESS Newswire's return on equity of -32.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B ACCSACCESS Newswire89.62% -$2.66 $41.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 65.55%. On the other hand ACCESS Newswire has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.37%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than ACCESS Newswire, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than ACCESS Newswire.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 ACCSACCESS Newswire2 0 0 -
Is IAS or ACCS More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ACCESS Newswire has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.377%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ACCESS Newswire offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ACCESS Newswire pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are larger than ACCESS Newswire quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is higher than ACCESS Newswire's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.90x while ACCESS Newswire's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.44x versus 1.47x for ACCESS Newswire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.44x 27.90x $134.1M $8M ACCSACCESS Newswire1.47x -- $1.5M -$10.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or CMGO?
CMG Holdings Group has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -817.39%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat CMG Holdings Group's return on equity of -8.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B CMGOCMG Holdings Group76.42% -$0.00 $1.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 65.55%. On the other hand CMG Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 54900%. Given that CMG Holdings Group has higher upside potential than Integral Ad Science Holding, analysts believe CMG Holdings Group is more attractive than Integral Ad Science Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 CMGOCMG Holdings Group0 0 0 -
Is IAS or CMGO More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CMG Holdings Group has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.188%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CMG Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CMG Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are larger than CMG Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $14.8K. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is higher than CMG Holdings Group's net income of -$121K. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.90x while CMG Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.44x versus 0.24x for CMG Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.44x 27.90x $134.1M $8M CMGOCMG Holdings Group0.24x -- $14.8K -$121K
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or LDWY?
Lendway has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -16.97%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat Lendway's return on equity of -20.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B LDWYLendway21.73% -$0.64 $54.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or LDWY?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 65.55%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than Lendway.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 LDWYLendway0 0 0 -
Is IAS or LDWY More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.225%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or LDWY?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or LDWY?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is higher than Lendway's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.90x while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.44x versus 0.20x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.44x 27.90x $134.1M $8M LDWYLendway0.20x -- $6.6M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or MCHX?
Marchex has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -16.02%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat Marchex's return on equity of -14.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B MCHXMarchex63.24% -$0.04 $32.6M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 65.55%. On the other hand Marchex has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 166.67%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than Integral Ad Science Holding, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than Integral Ad Science Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 MCHXMarchex1 0 0 -
Is IAS or MCHX More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marchex has a beta of 1.776, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.571%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marchex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marchex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are larger than Marchex quarterly revenues of $11.9M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is higher than Marchex's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.90x while Marchex's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.44x versus 1.49x for Marchex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.44x 27.90x $134.1M $8M MCHXMarchex1.49x -- $11.9M -$1.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or NCMI?
National CineMedia has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -87.97%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat National CineMedia's return on equity of -4.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B NCMINational CineMedia28.94% -$0.32 $370.8M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 65.55%. On the other hand National CineMedia has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 46.48%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than National CineMedia, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than National CineMedia.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 NCMINational CineMedia3 0 0 -
Is IAS or NCMI More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National CineMedia has a beta of 2.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.365%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National CineMedia offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National CineMedia pays out -1.35% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are larger than National CineMedia quarterly revenues of $34.9M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is higher than National CineMedia's net income of -$30.7M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.90x while National CineMedia's PE ratio is 2.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.44x versus 2.05x for National CineMedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.44x 27.90x $134.1M $8M NCMINational CineMedia2.05x 2.57x $34.9M -$30.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Acuity a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) is an industrial company specializing in lighting.…
What Stocks Are Recession-Proof?
Fears of a recession prevailed in Q2 2025 when the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
74
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
71
NUTX alert for May 15
Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 9.76% over the past day.
Buy
81
EXEL alert for May 15
Exelixis [EXEL] is up 3.67% over the past day.
Sell
29
GLBE alert for May 15
Global E Online [GLBE] is down 3.44% over the past day.
