IBKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 36.25%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 21.41%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $194.89, signalling downside risk potential of -4.23%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $61.34 which suggests that it could fall by -0.08%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has more downside risk than Robinhood Markets, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $927M. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $336M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 34.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.36x versus 17.33x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 26.13%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.75%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $194.89, signalling downside risk potential of -4.23%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $124.13 which suggests that it could fall by -5.28%. Given that Morgan Stanley has more downside risk than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.001%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 15.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.36x versus 3.51x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of -183.64%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $194.89, signalling downside risk potential of -4.23%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 72.84%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.659%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.36x versus 5.95x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 34.1%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 14.02%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $194.89, signalling downside risk potential of -4.23%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.79 which suggests that it could grow by 3.02%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.659%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 26.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.36x versus 7.80x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.