III Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conduent has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Information Services Group's net margin of 15.24%. Information Services Group's return on equity of -3.1% beat Conduent's return on equity of 61.77%.

Information Services Group has a consensus price target of $5.58, signalling upside risk potential of 69.19%. On the other hand Conduent has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 70.32%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Information Services Group, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Information Services Group.

Information Services Group has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.67900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduent has a beta of 1.444, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.382%.

Information Services Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Conduent offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Information Services Group pays 141.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent pays out -3.38% of its earnings as a dividend.

Information Services Group quarterly revenues are $61.3M, which are smaller than Conduent quarterly revenues of $807M. Information Services Group's net income of $1.1M is lower than Conduent's net income of $123M. Notably, Information Services Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Conduent's PE ratio is 1.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Information Services Group is 0.64x versus 0.23x for Conduent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Information Services Group's net margin of -11.03%. Information Services Group's return on equity of -3.1% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Information Services Group has a consensus price target of $5.58, signalling upside risk potential of 69.19%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.14%. Given that Information Services Group has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Information Services Group is more attractive than Castellum.

Information Services Group has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.67900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

Information Services Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Information Services Group pays 141.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Information Services Group quarterly revenues are $61.3M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Information Services Group's net income of $1.1M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Information Services Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Information Services Group is 0.64x versus 2.00x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Information Services Group's net margin of 4.19%. Information Services Group's return on equity of -3.1% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 23.63%.

Information Services Group has a consensus price target of $5.58, signalling upside risk potential of 69.19%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Information Services Group has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe Information Services Group is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

Information Services Group has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.67900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Information Services Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Information Services Group pays 141.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Information Services Group quarterly revenues are $61.3M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $20.1M. Information Services Group's net income of $1.1M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of $843K. Notably, Information Services Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 23.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Information Services Group is 0.64x versus 11.32x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Information Services Group's net margin of --. Information Services Group's return on equity of -3.1% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Information Services Group has a consensus price target of $5.58, signalling upside risk potential of 69.19%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.87%. Given that Information Services Group has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Information Services Group is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Information Services Group has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.67900000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Information Services Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.46%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Information Services Group pays 141.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Information Services Group quarterly revenues are $61.3M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Information Services Group's net income of $1.1M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Information Services Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Information Services Group is 0.64x versus 10.35x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.