IOSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Balchem has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Innospec's net margin of 14.1%. Innospec's return on equity of 12.17% beat Balchem's return on equity of 11.16%.

Innospec has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Balchem has an analysts' consensus of $190.33 which suggests that it could grow by 18.58%. Given that Balchem has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Balchem is more attractive than Innospec.

Innospec has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.261% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Balchem has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.375%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Balchem offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Innospec pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Balchem pays out 21.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $443.4M, which are larger than Balchem quarterly revenues of $239.9M. Innospec's net income of $33.4M is lower than Balchem's net income of $33.8M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.70x while Balchem's PE ratio is 43.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.51x versus 5.56x for Balchem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Innospec's net margin of -0.63%. Innospec's return on equity of 12.17% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Innospec has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innospec has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Innospec is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Innospec has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.261% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Innospec pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $443.4M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Innospec's net income of $33.4M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.70x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 12.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.51x versus 0.21x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Innospec's net margin of --. Innospec's return on equity of 12.17% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Innospec has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 233.33%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Innospec.

Innospec has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.261% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innospec pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $443.4M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Innospec's net income of $33.4M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.70x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.51x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Innospec's net margin of --. Innospec's return on equity of 12.17% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Innospec has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 130.77%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Innospec.

Innospec has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.261% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innospec pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $443.4M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Innospec's net income of $33.4M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.70x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.51x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.