LYFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cyngn has a net margin of -0.82% compared to Lyft's net margin of -11405.93%. Lyft's return on equity of -11.93% beat Cyngn's return on equity of -249.93%.

Lyft has a consensus price target of $19.27, signalling upside risk potential of 34.53%. On the other hand Cyngn has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1619.94%. Given that Cyngn has higher upside potential than Lyft, analysts believe Cyngn is more attractive than Lyft.

Lyft has a beta of 2.144, which suggesting that the stock is 114.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cyngn has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lyft has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cyngn offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lyft pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cyngn pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lyft quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Cyngn quarterly revenues of $47.6K. Lyft's net income of -$12.4M is lower than Cyngn's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Lyft's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cyngn's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lyft is 1.06x versus 8.23x for Cyngn. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

F5 has a net margin of -0.82% compared to Lyft's net margin of 22.14%. Lyft's return on equity of -11.93% beat F5's return on equity of 19.23%.

Lyft has a consensus price target of $19.27, signalling upside risk potential of 34.53%. On the other hand F5 has an analysts' consensus of $242.86 which suggests that it could fall by -5.61%. Given that Lyft has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe Lyft is more attractive than F5.

Lyft has a beta of 2.144, which suggesting that the stock is 114.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F5 has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.653%.

Lyft has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. F5 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lyft pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. F5 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lyft quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than F5 quarterly revenues of $746.7M. Lyft's net income of -$12.4M is lower than F5's net income of $165.3M. Notably, Lyft's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while F5's PE ratio is 26.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lyft is 1.06x versus 5.42x for F5. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -0.82% compared to Lyft's net margin of 19.78%. Lyft's return on equity of -11.93% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.27%.

Lyft has a consensus price target of $19.27, signalling upside risk potential of 34.53%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $45.22 which suggests that it could fall by -36.07%. Given that Lyft has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Lyft is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Lyft has a beta of 2.144, which suggesting that the stock is 114.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lyft has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lyft pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lyft quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $725.5M. Lyft's net income of -$12.4M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $143.5M. Notably, Lyft's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 349.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lyft is 1.06x versus 63.62x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of -0.82% compared to Lyft's net margin of 14.99%. Lyft's return on equity of -11.93% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 13.38%.

Lyft has a consensus price target of $19.27, signalling upside risk potential of 34.53%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $132.69 which suggests that it could grow by 9.16%. Given that Lyft has higher upside potential than The Trade Desk, analysts believe Lyft is more attractive than The Trade Desk.

Lyft has a beta of 2.144, which suggesting that the stock is 114.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.187%.

Lyft has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lyft pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lyft quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $628M. Lyft's net income of -$12.4M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $94.2M. Notably, Lyft's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 199.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lyft is 1.06x versus 26.29x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.