MPWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microchip Technology has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of -5.22%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 4.76%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $817.74, signalling upside risk potential of 71.34%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $65.61 which suggests that it could grow by 81.13%. Given that Microchip Technology has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Microchip Technology is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.332%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 5.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is higher than Microchip Technology's net income of -$53.6M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.98x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 64.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 10.56x versus 4.13x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 11.02%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $817.74, signalling upside risk potential of 71.34%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 128.18%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.98x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 10.56x versus 7.42x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 56.17%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $817.74, signalling upside risk potential of 71.34%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $170.01 which suggests that it could grow by 80.27%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.98x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 32.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 10.56x versus 17.93x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Instruments has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 30.07%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.14%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $817.74, signalling upside risk potential of 71.34%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $204.53 which suggests that it could grow by 35.21%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.397%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is higher than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.98x while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 29.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 10.56x versus 8.89x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.