NEXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baker Hughes has a net margin of -- compared to NextDecade's net margin of 6.26%. NextDecade's return on equity of -- beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87%.

NextDecade has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.46%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $47.13 which suggests that it could grow by 23.45%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than NextDecade.

NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.121%.

NextDecade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. NextDecade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NextDecade quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $6.4B. NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $402M. Notably, NextDecade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NextDecade is -- versus 1.37x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to NextDecade's net margin of -18.12%. NextDecade's return on equity of -- beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87%.

NextDecade has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.46%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 111.86%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than NextDecade.

NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.617%.

NextDecade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NextDecade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NextDecade quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $154M. NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M is lower than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$27.9M. Notably, NextDecade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NextDecade is -- versus 0.06x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of -- compared to NextDecade's net margin of 7.47%. NextDecade's return on equity of -- beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18%.

NextDecade has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.46%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.4%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.803%.

NextDecade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NextDecade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NextDecade quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $674.5M. NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M is lower than Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M. Notably, NextDecade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 11.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NextDecade is -- versus 0.75x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viper Energy has a net margin of -- compared to NextDecade's net margin of 30.61%. NextDecade's return on equity of -- beat Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68%.

NextDecade has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.46%. On the other hand Viper Energy has an analysts' consensus of $53.40 which suggests that it could grow by 23.67%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than NextDecade.

NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viper Energy has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.551%.

NextDecade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viper Energy offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. NextDecade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy pays out 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

NextDecade quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Viper Energy quarterly revenues of $245M. NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M is lower than Viper Energy's net income of $75M. Notably, NextDecade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viper Energy's PE ratio is 11.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NextDecade is -- versus 4.91x for Viper Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.