NFE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Excelerate Energy has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 3.98%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Excelerate Energy's return on equity of 1.78%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $12.57, signalling upside risk potential of 111.29%. On the other hand Excelerate Energy has an analysts' consensus of $32.20 which suggests that it could grow by 17.09%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Excelerate Energy, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Excelerate Energy.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.459, which suggesting that the stock is 45.875% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelerate Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Excelerate Energy offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy pays out 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are larger than Excelerate Energy quarterly revenues of $274.6M. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than Excelerate Energy's net income of $10.9M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Excelerate Energy's PE ratio is 22.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.55x versus 0.83x for Excelerate Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 6.29%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.65%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $12.57, signalling upside risk potential of 111.29%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.77 which suggests that it could grow by 31.1%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Energy Transfer LP, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Energy Transfer LP.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.459, which suggesting that the stock is 45.875% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.928%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 7.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $21B. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.3B. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 13.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.55x versus 0.73x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 22.02%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 35.87%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $12.57, signalling upside risk potential of 111.29%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $254.55 which suggests that it could grow by 7.27%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Cheniere Energy.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.459, which suggesting that the stock is 45.875% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.415, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.511%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than Cheniere Energy's net income of $977M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 16.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.55x versus 3.46x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vonage Holdings has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of --. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Vonage Holdings's return on equity of --.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $12.57, signalling upside risk potential of 111.29%. On the other hand Vonage Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Vonage Holdings, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Vonage Holdings.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.459, which suggesting that the stock is 45.875% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vonage Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Vonage Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Vonage Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are larger than Vonage Holdings quarterly revenues of --. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is higher than Vonage Holdings's net income of --. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Vonage Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.55x versus -- for Vonage Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.