NUKK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of 17.52%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $328.59 which suggests that it could grow by 10.87%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.199%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 58.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 2.99x versus 10.78x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of -9.14%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 93.25%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 2.99x versus 0.87x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of -6.7%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.91%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 2.99x versus 1.15x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of -3.57%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -11.4%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $101.57 which suggests that it could fall by -12.21%. Given that Cloudflare has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Cloudflare is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.273%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $430.1M. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is higher than Cloudflare's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 2.99x versus 24.99x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.