PAGP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genesis Energy LP has a net margin of 0.7% compared to Plains GP Holdings LP's net margin of -117.77%. Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 1% beat Genesis Energy LP's return on equity of -37.89%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a consensus price target of $21.46, signalling upside risk potential of 14.34%. On the other hand Genesis Energy LP has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.78%. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Genesis Energy LP, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than Genesis Energy LP.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.43% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genesis Energy LP has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.19%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genesis Energy LP offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Plains GP Holdings LP pays 243.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Genesis Energy LP pays out -254.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Genesis Energy LP quarterly revenues of $398.3M. Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $84M is higher than Genesis Energy LP's net income of -$469.1M. Notably, Plains GP Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Genesis Energy LP's PE ratio is 34.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains GP Holdings LP is 0.07x versus 0.72x for Genesis Energy LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of 0.7% compared to Plains GP Holdings LP's net margin of 51.01%. Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 1% beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 63.09%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a consensus price target of $21.46, signalling upside risk potential of 14.34%. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.43% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.054, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.611%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 8.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Plains GP Holdings LP pays 243.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $159.1K. Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $84M is higher than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $81.1K. Notably, Plains GP Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains GP Holdings LP is 0.07x versus 8.54x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 0.7% compared to Plains GP Holdings LP's net margin of 3.69%. Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 1% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 7.11%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a consensus price target of $21.46, signalling upside risk potential of 14.34%. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.14 which suggests that it could grow by 20.26%. Given that Plains All American Pipeline LP has higher upside potential than Plains GP Holdings LP, analysts believe Plains All American Pipeline LP is more attractive than Plains GP Holdings LP.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.43% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.659%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 7.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Plains GP Holdings LP pays 243.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $12B, which are smaller than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $12B. Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $84M is lower than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $443M. Notably, Plains GP Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 18.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains GP Holdings LP is 0.07x versus 0.25x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabine Royalty Trust has a net margin of 0.7% compared to Plains GP Holdings LP's net margin of 93.57%. Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 1% beat Sabine Royalty Trust's return on equity of 876.22%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a consensus price target of $21.46, signalling upside risk potential of 14.34%. On the other hand Sabine Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -50.89%. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Sabine Royalty Trust, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than Sabine Royalty Trust.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.43% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabine Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.299, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.141%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sabine Royalty Trust offers a yield of 8.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Plains GP Holdings LP pays 243.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Sabine Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $84M is higher than Sabine Royalty Trust's net income of $18.1M. Notably, Plains GP Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Sabine Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 12.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains GP Holdings LP is 0.07x versus 11.88x for Sabine Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.