PCYO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadiz has a net margin of 68.45% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of -210.7%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.75% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -84.84%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -45.33%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 221.54%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.768%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Pure Cycle's net income of $3.9M is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.59x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 9.94x versus 56.72x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Middlesex Water has a net margin of 68.45% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 25.99%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.75% beat Middlesex Water's return on equity of 9.58%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -45.33%. On the other hand Middlesex Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.49%. Given that Middlesex Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Middlesex Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Middlesex Water has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.542%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Middlesex Water offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water pays out 71.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Middlesex Water quarterly revenues of $55.1M. Pure Cycle's net income of $3.9M is lower than Middlesex Water's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.59x while Middlesex Water's PE ratio is 21.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 9.94x versus 4.92x for Middlesex Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SJW Group has a net margin of 68.45% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 17.17%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.75% beat SJW Group's return on equity of 7.14%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -45.33%. On the other hand SJW Group has an analysts' consensus of $61.83 which suggests that it could grow by 33.64%. Given that SJW Group has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe SJW Group is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJW Group has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.33%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SJW Group offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SJW Group pays out 56.37% of its earnings as a dividend. SJW Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than SJW Group quarterly revenues of $225.1M. Pure Cycle's net income of $3.9M is lower than SJW Group's net income of $38.7M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.59x while SJW Group's PE ratio is 16.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 9.94x versus 2.08x for SJW Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The York Water has a net margin of 68.45% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 29.74%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.75% beat The York Water's return on equity of 9.5%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -45.33%. On the other hand The York Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.96%. Given that The York Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe The York Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The York Water has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.659%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The York Water offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water pays out 48.79% of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than The York Water quarterly revenues of $19.7M. Pure Cycle's net income of $3.9M is lower than The York Water's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.59x while The York Water's PE ratio is 21.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 9.94x versus 6.01x for The York Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.