PFIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cathay General Bancorp has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Peoples Financial Services's net margin of 43.01%. Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 2.16% beat Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 10.23%.

Peoples Financial Services has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.4%. On the other hand Cathay General Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $48.80 which suggests that it could grow by 21.54%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Cathay General Bancorp, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Cathay General Bancorp.

Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 43.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.192%.

Peoples Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Cathay General Bancorp offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Peoples Financial Services pays 212.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay General Bancorp pays out 34.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay General Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Peoples Financial Services's is not.

Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Cathay General Bancorp quarterly revenues of $186.5M. Peoples Financial Services's net income of $6.1M is lower than Cathay General Bancorp's net income of $80.2M. Notably, Peoples Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.20x while Cathay General Bancorp's PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peoples Financial Services is 2.76x versus 3.98x for Cathay General Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Peoples Financial Services's net margin of 20.42%. Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 2.16% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Peoples Financial Services has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.4%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.34%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 43.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

Peoples Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Peoples Financial Services pays 212.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Peoples Financial Services's is not.

Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Peoples Financial Services's net income of $6.1M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Peoples Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.20x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 17.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peoples Financial Services is 2.76x versus 2.95x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Peoples Financial Services's net margin of 28.72%. Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 2.16% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

Peoples Financial Services has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.4%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.66%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Park National.

Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 43.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

Peoples Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Park National offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Peoples Financial Services pays 212.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Peoples Financial Services's is not.

Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Peoples Financial Services's net income of $6.1M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Peoples Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.20x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peoples Financial Services is 2.76x versus 4.79x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 13.78% compared to Peoples Financial Services's net margin of 25.81%. Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 2.16% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

Peoples Financial Services has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.4%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.45%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.567, which suggesting that the stock is 43.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.208%.

Peoples Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Peoples Financial Services pays 212.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Peoples Financial Services's is not.

Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues are $44.2M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. Peoples Financial Services's net income of $6.1M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Peoples Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.20x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peoples Financial Services is 2.76x versus 2.92x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.