PLBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of -262.4% compared to PLBY Group's net margin of 16.25%. PLBY Group's return on equity of -314.81% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.64%.

PLBY Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -38.78%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $42.33 which suggests that it could grow by 48.43%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than PLBY Group, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than PLBY Group.

PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.664%.

PLBY Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PLBY Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PLBY Group quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $321.6M. PLBY Group's net income of -$33.8M is lower than Jakks Pacific's net income of $52.3M. Notably, PLBY Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 10.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PLBY Group is 0.68x versus 0.45x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -262.4% compared to PLBY Group's net margin of 20.2%. PLBY Group's return on equity of -314.81% beat Mattel's return on equity of 26.12%.

PLBY Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -38.78%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.08 which suggests that it could grow by 34.23%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than PLBY Group, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than PLBY Group.

PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.641%.

PLBY Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PLBY Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PLBY Group quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PLBY Group's net income of -$33.8M is lower than Mattel's net income of $372.4M. Notably, PLBY Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PLBY Group is 0.68x versus 1.16x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Topgolf Callaway Brands has a net margin of -262.4% compared to PLBY Group's net margin of -0.36%. PLBY Group's return on equity of -314.81% beat Topgolf Callaway Brands's return on equity of -0.31%.

PLBY Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -38.78%. On the other hand Topgolf Callaway Brands has an analysts' consensus of $12.12 which suggests that it could grow by 29.21%. Given that Topgolf Callaway Brands has higher upside potential than PLBY Group, analysts believe Topgolf Callaway Brands is more attractive than PLBY Group.

PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Topgolf Callaway Brands has a beta of 1.698, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.813%.

PLBY Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Topgolf Callaway Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PLBY Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Topgolf Callaway Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PLBY Group quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Topgolf Callaway Brands quarterly revenues of $1B. PLBY Group's net income of -$33.8M is lower than Topgolf Callaway Brands's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, PLBY Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Topgolf Callaway Brands's PE ratio is 100.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PLBY Group is 0.68x versus 0.43x for Topgolf Callaway Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SRM Entertainment has a net margin of -262.4% compared to PLBY Group's net margin of -128.81%. PLBY Group's return on equity of -314.81% beat SRM Entertainment's return on equity of -112.23%.

PLBY Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -38.78%. On the other hand SRM Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PLBY Group has higher upside potential than SRM Entertainment, analysts believe PLBY Group is more attractive than SRM Entertainment.

PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SRM Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PLBY Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SRM Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PLBY Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SRM Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PLBY Group quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are larger than SRM Entertainment quarterly revenues of $876.4K. PLBY Group's net income of -$33.8M is lower than SRM Entertainment's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, PLBY Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SRM Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PLBY Group is 0.68x versus 1.44x for SRM Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.