Why Is Chewy Stock Up — And Will It Keep Climbing?
We are all witnesses to the crazy e-commerce industry boom…
Sell
32
PTEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.08
Seasonality move
:
2.12%
Day range:
$5.92 - $6.11
52-week range:
$5.12 - $11.70
Dividend yield:
5.26%
P/E ratio:
36.81x
P/S ratio:
0.46x
P/B ratio:
0.69x
Volume:
13.1M
Avg. volume:
13.6M
1-year change:
-45.91%
Market cap:
$2.4B
Revenue:
$5.4B
EPS (TTM):
-$2.60
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
|
$1.2B | -$0.04 | -8.1% | -98.46% | $9.46 |
|
BATL
Battalion Oil
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HES
Hess
|
$3B | $1.61 | -5.97% | -34.64% | $161.33 |
|
HP
Helmerich & Payne
|
$955.4M | $0.59 | 42.93% | -29.16% | $29.53 |
|
NE
Noble Corp PLC
|
$863.5M | $0.35 | 26.21% | -58.61% | $34.27 |
|
SOC
Sable Offshore
|
-- | -$0.43 | -- | -91.46% | $27.67 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
|
$6.09 | $9.46 | $2.4B | 36.81x | $0.08 | 5.26% | 0.46x |
|
BATL
Battalion Oil
|
$1.34 | -- | $22.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
|
HES
Hess
|
$132.34 | $161.33 | $40.8B | 14.70x | $0.50 | 1.46% | 3.16x |
|
HP
Helmerich & Payne
|
$19.97 | $29.53 | $2B | 6.63x | $0.25 | 6.71% | 0.72x |
|
NE
Noble Corp PLC
|
$21.00 | $34.27 | $3.3B | 7.02x | $0.50 | 9.05% | 1.04x |
|
SOC
Sable Offshore
|
$19.82 | $27.67 | $1.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
|
26.26% | 0.215 | 38.35% | 1.25x |
|
BATL
Battalion Oil
|
80.32% | 1.154 | 130.07% | 0.42x |
|
HES
Hess
|
43.34% | -0.190 | 20.52% | 0.93x |
|
HP
Helmerich & Payne
|
37.68% | 0.256 | 56.89% | 2.19x |
|
NE
Noble Corp PLC
|
29.86% | 1.116 | 39.68% | 1.17x |
|
SOC
Sable Offshore
|
-- | 2.709 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
|
$87.3M | $17.4M | -19.59% | -25.66% | 1.59% | $46.3M |
|
BATL
Battalion Oil
|
$19.9M | $1.1M | 9.82% | 37.8% | 61.75% | -$12M |
|
HES
Hess
|
$2.4B | $990M | 14.08% | 25.2% | 31.97% | -$444M |
|
HP
Helmerich & Payne
|
$166.4M | $92.8M | 7.8% | 10.63% | 14.58% | $51.9M |
|
NE
Noble Corp PLC
|
$222.5M | $191.3M | 8.33% | 10.6% | 18.44% | -$4.4M |
|
SOC
Sable Offshore
|
-$2.8M | -$54.6M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Patterson-UTI Energy vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or BATL?
Battalion Oil has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 47.78%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Battalion Oil's return on equity of 37.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B BATLBattalion Oil43.92% $0.34 $177.8M -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or BATL?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling upside risk potential of 55.41%. On the other hand Battalion Oil has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1288.06%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 4 0 BATLBattalion Oil0 0 0 -
Is PTEN or BATL More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.213%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or BATL?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Battalion Oil offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Battalion Oil pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or BATL?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Battalion Oil quarterly revenues of $45.3M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is lower than Battalion Oil's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Battalion Oil's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.46x versus 0.11x for Battalion Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.46x 36.81x $1.3B $1M BATLBattalion Oil0.11x -- $45.3M $21.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or HES?
Hess has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 16.97%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Hess's return on equity of 25.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B HESHess76.68% $1.76 $20.6B -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or HES?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling upside risk potential of 55.41%. On the other hand Hess has an analysts' consensus of $161.33 which suggests that it could grow by 21.9%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Hess.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 4 0 HESHess5 7 1 -
Is PTEN or HES More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.287%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or HES?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Hess offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess pays out 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or HES?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Hess quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is lower than Hess's net income of $542M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Hess's PE ratio is 14.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.46x versus 3.16x for Hess. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.46x 36.81x $1.3B $1M HESHess3.16x 14.70x $3.2B $542M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or HP?
Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 8.09%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B HPHelmerich & Payne24.56% $0.54 $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or HP?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling upside risk potential of 55.41%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $29.53 which suggests that it could grow by 47.89%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 4 0 HPHelmerich & Payne3 10 1 -
Is PTEN or HP More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.45500000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or HP?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 6.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or HP?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $677.3M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 6.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.46x versus 0.72x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.46x 36.81x $1.3B $1M HPHelmerich & Payne0.72x 6.63x $677.3M $54.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or NE?
Noble Corp PLC has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 10.42%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Noble Corp PLC's return on equity of 10.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B NENoble Corp PLC24% $0.59 $6.6B -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or NE?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling upside risk potential of 55.41%. On the other hand Noble Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $34.27 which suggests that it could grow by 63.2%. Given that Noble Corp PLC has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Noble Corp PLC is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 4 0 NENoble Corp PLC5 4 0 -
Is PTEN or NE More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or NE?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Noble Corp PLC offers a yield of 9.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC pays out 61.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or NE?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Noble Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $927.3M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is lower than Noble Corp PLC's net income of $96.6M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Noble Corp PLC's PE ratio is 7.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.46x versus 1.04x for Noble Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.46x 36.81x $1.3B $1M NENoble Corp PLC1.04x 7.02x $927.3M $96.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or SOC?
Sable Offshore has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of --. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Sable Offshore's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B SOCSable Offshore-- -$4.11 -- -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or SOC?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling upside risk potential of 55.41%. On the other hand Sable Offshore has an analysts' consensus of $27.67 which suggests that it could grow by 39.59%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Sable Offshore, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Sable Offshore.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 4 0 SOCSable Offshore4 0 1 -
Is PTEN or SOC More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sable Offshore has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or SOC?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Sable Offshore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Sable Offshore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or SOC?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Sable Offshore quarterly revenues of --. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is higher than Sable Offshore's net income of -$255.6M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Sable Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.46x versus -- for Sable Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.46x 36.81x $1.3B $1M SOCSable Offshore-- -- -- -$255.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Netflix a Must-own Stock?
The early months of 2025 have been very hard on…
Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?
In February, Pershing Square manager Bill Ackman revealed that his…
Stock Ideas
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
27
SAIA alert for Apr 26
Saia [SAIA] is down 30.77% over the past day.
Sell
48
APPF alert for Apr 26
AppFolio [APPF] is down 18.16% over the past day.
Sell
15
KNSL alert for Apr 26
Kinsale Capital Group [KNSL] is down 16.33% over the past day.
