PWOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Central Pacific Financial has a net margin of 39.38% compared to Penns Woods Bancorp's net margin of 26.27%. Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.53% beat Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.92%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Central Pacific Financial has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.94%. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.451, which suggesting that the stock is 54.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.615%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Central Pacific Financial offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Penns Woods Bancorp pays 54.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Pacific Financial pays out 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are smaller than Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues of $67.6M. Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $7.4M is lower than Central Pacific Financial's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Penns Woods Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Central Pacific Financial's PE ratio is 12.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Penns Woods Bancorp is 3.19x versus 2.87x for Central Pacific Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enterprise Bancorp has a net margin of 39.38% compared to Penns Woods Bancorp's net margin of 23.78%. Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.53% beat Enterprise Bancorp's return on equity of 11.37%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enterprise Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Penns Woods Bancorp has higher upside potential than Enterprise Bancorp, analysts believe Penns Woods Bancorp is more attractive than Enterprise Bancorp.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.451, which suggesting that the stock is 54.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enterprise Bancorp has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.644%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Enterprise Bancorp offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Penns Woods Bancorp pays 54.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Enterprise Bancorp pays out 26.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are smaller than Enterprise Bancorp quarterly revenues of $43.9M. Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $7.4M is lower than Enterprise Bancorp's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Penns Woods Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Enterprise Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Penns Woods Bancorp is 3.19x versus 2.79x for Enterprise Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eagle Financial Services has a net margin of 39.38% compared to Penns Woods Bancorp's net margin of 35.76%. Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.53% beat Eagle Financial Services's return on equity of 13.6%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eagle Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $38.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.16%. Given that Eagle Financial Services has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Eagle Financial Services is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.451, which suggesting that the stock is 54.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eagle Financial Services has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.857%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Eagle Financial Services offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Penns Woods Bancorp pays 54.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Eagle Financial Services pays out 28.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are larger than Eagle Financial Services quarterly revenues of $17.3M. Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $7.4M is higher than Eagle Financial Services's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Penns Woods Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Eagle Financial Services's PE ratio is 7.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Penns Woods Bancorp is 3.19x versus 1.65x for Eagle Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 39.38% compared to Penns Woods Bancorp's net margin of 20.42%. Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.53% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.1%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.451, which suggesting that the stock is 54.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.224%.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Penns Woods Bancorp pays 54.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $7.4M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Penns Woods Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Penns Woods Bancorp is 3.19x versus 3.16x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.