RCAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -24.46%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -49.92%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $90.38 which suggests that it could grow by 8.6%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.291% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.414%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $336.9M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$82.4M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 46.99x versus 4.09x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of 28.51%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.24%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that Qualcomm has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Qualcomm is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.291% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.479%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $10.2B. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 17.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 46.99x versus 4.59x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -623.76%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -51.99%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could fall by -68.07%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.291% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$14.8M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 46.99x versus 150.35x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -19.01%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -10.81%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.39%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.43%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.291% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.237%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $140M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$26.6M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 46.99x versus 1.13x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.