SBAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of 33.23% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of -43.73%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Crown Castle's return on equity of -149.84%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $254.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $114.11 which suggests that it could grow by 10.49%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.215%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 6.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out -69.92% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $664.2M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.1B. SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M is higher than Crown Castle's net income of -$464M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.30x while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 9.51x versus 7.51x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthpeak Properties has a net margin of 33.23% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 6.09%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $254.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties has an analysts' consensus of $23.79 which suggests that it could grow by 36.83%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.297%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Healthpeak Properties offers a yield of 7.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $664.2M, which are smaller than Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues of $702.9M. SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M is higher than Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.30x while Healthpeak Properties's PE ratio is 43.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 9.51x versus 4.36x for Healthpeak Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weyerhaeuser has a net margin of 33.23% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 4.71%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Weyerhaeuser's return on equity of 3.7%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $254.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Weyerhaeuser has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.07%. Given that Weyerhaeuser has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Weyerhaeuser is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.284%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Weyerhaeuser offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 172.73% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Weyerhaeuser's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $664.2M, which are smaller than Weyerhaeuser quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M is higher than Weyerhaeuser's net income of $83M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.30x while Weyerhaeuser's PE ratio is 51.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 9.51x versus 2.66x for Weyerhaeuser. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xenia Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 33.23% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 5.39%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Xenia Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 1.8%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $254.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Xenia Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $12.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that Xenia Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Xenia Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xenia Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.598, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.816%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Xenia Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Xenia Hotels & Resorts pays out 296.85% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Xenia Hotels & Resorts's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $664.2M, which are larger than Xenia Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $288.9M. SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M is higher than Xenia Hotels & Resorts's net income of $15.6M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.30x while Xenia Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 52.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 9.51x versus 1.11x for Xenia Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.