SHIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dycom Industries has a net margin of -0.94% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 5.49%. Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81% beat Dycom Industries's return on equity of 20.08%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.46%. On the other hand Dycom Industries has an analysts' consensus of $219.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.35%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than Dycom Industries, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than Dycom Industries.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.034%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dycom Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dycom Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $166M, which are smaller than Dycom Industries quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Dycom Industries's net income of $69.8M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dycom Industries's PE ratio is 23.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.13x versus 1.16x for Dycom Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Services of America has a net margin of -0.94% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 6.36%. Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81% beat Energy Services of America's return on equity of 58.24%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.46%. On the other hand Energy Services of America has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 73.16%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Shimmick, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Shimmick.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.713%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Services of America offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America pays out 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $166M, which are larger than Energy Services of America quarterly revenues of $104.7M. Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Energy Services of America's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy Services of America's PE ratio is 7.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.13x versus 0.54x for Energy Services of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec has a net margin of -0.94% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 2.93%. Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81% beat MasTec's return on equity of 3.24%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.46%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $158.13 which suggests that it could grow by 7.89%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than MasTec, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than MasTec.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.736, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.641%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $166M, which are smaller than MasTec quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M is lower than MasTec's net income of $95.2M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MasTec's PE ratio is 130.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.13x versus 0.94x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MYR Group has a net margin of -0.94% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 1.2%. Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81% beat MYR Group's return on equity of 6.06%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.46%. On the other hand MYR Group has an analysts' consensus of $171.6667 which suggests that it could grow by 24.55%. Given that MYR Group has higher upside potential than Shimmick, analysts believe MYR Group is more attractive than Shimmick.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYR Group has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.365%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MYR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MYR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $166M, which are smaller than MYR Group quarterly revenues of $888M. Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M is lower than MYR Group's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MYR Group's PE ratio is 63.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.13x versus 0.69x for MYR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.