TCOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of 3.35%. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $73.61, signalling upside risk potential of 34.49%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 110.08%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.05x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JD.com has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of 2.84%. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat JD.com's return on equity of 13.91%.

Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $73.61, signalling upside risk potential of 34.49%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $54.65 which suggests that it could grow by 50.07%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.465%.

Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. JD.com offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is lower than JD.com's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while JD.com's PE ratio is 9.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.05x versus 0.35x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of -8.26%. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.11%.

Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $73.61, signalling upside risk potential of 34.49%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $24.34 which suggests that it could grow by 21.68%. Given that Trip.com Group has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe Trip.com Group is more attractive than XPeng.

Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is higher than XPeng's net income of -$184.8M. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.05x versus 3.32x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum China Holdings has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of 4.43%. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 13.66%.

Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $73.61, signalling upside risk potential of 34.49%. On the other hand Yum China Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $60.32 which suggests that it could grow by 35.89%. Given that Yum China Holdings has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe Yum China Holdings is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.542%.

Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Yum China Holdings offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings pays out 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is higher than Yum China Holdings's net income of $115M. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Yum China Holdings's PE ratio is 19.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.05x versus 1.53x for Yum China Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.