TRVG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 5.34% compared to trivago NV's net margin of 43.07%. trivago NV's return on equity of -11.84% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 38.66%.

trivago NV has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $713.63 which suggests that it could grow by 30.4%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than trivago NV, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than trivago NV.

trivago NV has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.917%.

trivago NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. trivago NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

trivago NV quarterly revenues are $101M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $48.4B. trivago NV's net income of $5.4M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $20.8B. Notably, trivago NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for trivago NV is 0.51x versus 8.69x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opera has a net margin of 5.34% compared to trivago NV's net margin of 14.56%. trivago NV's return on equity of -11.84% beat Opera's return on equity of 17.82%.

trivago NV has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand Opera has an analysts' consensus of $25.64 which suggests that it could grow by 65.12%. Given that Opera has higher upside potential than trivago NV, analysts believe Opera is more attractive than trivago NV.

trivago NV has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opera has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.081%.

trivago NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opera offers a yield of 5.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. trivago NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opera pays out 15.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Opera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

trivago NV quarterly revenues are $101M, which are smaller than Opera quarterly revenues of $123.2M. trivago NV's net income of $5.4M is lower than Opera's net income of $17.9M. Notably, trivago NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Opera's PE ratio is 8.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for trivago NV is 0.51x versus 3.10x for Opera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

comScore has a net margin of 5.34% compared to trivago NV's net margin of 3.31%. trivago NV's return on equity of -11.84% beat comScore's return on equity of -211.7%.

trivago NV has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand comScore has an analysts' consensus of $7.13 which suggests that it could grow by 39.57%. Given that comScore has higher upside potential than trivago NV, analysts believe comScore is more attractive than trivago NV.

trivago NV has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison comScore has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.035%.

trivago NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. comScore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. trivago NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. comScore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

trivago NV quarterly revenues are $101M, which are larger than comScore quarterly revenues of $94.9M. trivago NV's net income of $5.4M is higher than comScore's net income of $3.1M. Notably, trivago NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while comScore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for trivago NV is 0.51x versus 0.07x for comScore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zedge has a net margin of 5.34% compared to trivago NV's net margin of -24.06%. trivago NV's return on equity of -11.84% beat Zedge's return on equity of -6.45%.

trivago NV has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand Zedge has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.89%. Given that Zedge has higher upside potential than trivago NV, analysts believe Zedge is more attractive than trivago NV.

trivago NV has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.4% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zedge has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.607%.

trivago NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zedge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. trivago NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zedge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

trivago NV quarterly revenues are $101M, which are larger than Zedge quarterly revenues of $7M. trivago NV's net income of $5.4M is higher than Zedge's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, trivago NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zedge's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for trivago NV is 0.51x versus 1.21x for Zedge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.