UXIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -12.24% compared to Uxin's net margin of 3.35%. Uxin's return on equity of -- beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Uxin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 885.78%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 87.5%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

Uxin has a beta of 1.365, which suggesting that the stock is 36.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.707%.

Uxin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Uxin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uxin quarterly revenues are $69.4M, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Uxin's net income of -$8.5M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Uxin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uxin is 2.86x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MOGU has a net margin of -12.24% compared to Uxin's net margin of --. Uxin's return on equity of -- beat MOGU's return on equity of -7.88%.

Uxin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 885.78%. On the other hand MOGU has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1183.84%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than Uxin, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than Uxin.

Uxin has a beta of 1.365, which suggesting that the stock is 36.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MOGU has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.48%.

Uxin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MOGU offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uxin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MOGU pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uxin quarterly revenues are $69.4M, which are larger than MOGU quarterly revenues of --. Uxin's net income of -$8.5M is higher than MOGU's net income of --. Notably, Uxin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MOGU's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uxin is 2.86x versus 1.02x for MOGU. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of -12.24% compared to Uxin's net margin of -36.2%. Uxin's return on equity of -- beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

Uxin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 885.78%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.09 which suggests that it could grow by 29.85%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than NIO.

Uxin has a beta of 1.365, which suggesting that the stock is 36.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.735, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.455%.

Uxin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uxin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uxin quarterly revenues are $69.4M, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Uxin's net income of -$8.5M is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, Uxin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uxin is 2.86x versus 0.88x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -12.24% compared to Uxin's net margin of -23.56%. Uxin's return on equity of -- beat Tuniu's return on equity of 7.57%.

Uxin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 885.78%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 77.26%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than Tuniu, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than Tuniu.

Uxin has a beta of 1.365, which suggesting that the stock is 36.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.724%.

Uxin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Uxin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uxin quarterly revenues are $69.4M, which are larger than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $14.3M. Uxin's net income of -$8.5M is lower than Tuniu's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Uxin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tuniu's PE ratio is 10.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uxin is 2.86x versus 1.62x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.