VRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -46.99% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of 2.26%. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -26.98% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

Vera Bradley has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 131.21%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.89%. Given that Vera Bradley has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Vera Bradley is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.758, which suggesting that the stock is 75.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.912%.

Vera Bradley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Vera Bradley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley quarterly revenues are $100M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. Vera Bradley's net income of -$47M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Vera Bradley's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley is 0.14x versus 0.46x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -46.99% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of -23.71%. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -26.98% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -16.73%.

Vera Bradley has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 131.21%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 455.56%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Vera Bradley, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Vera Bradley.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.758, which suggesting that the stock is 75.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.928, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.831%.

Vera Bradley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vera Bradley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley quarterly revenues are $100M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $163.3M. Vera Bradley's net income of -$47M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$38.7M. Notably, Vera Bradley's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley is 0.14x versus 0.04x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -46.99% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of --. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -26.98% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Vera Bradley has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 131.21%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.03%. Given that Vera Bradley has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Vera Bradley is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.758, which suggesting that the stock is 75.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Vera Bradley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vera Bradley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley quarterly revenues are $100M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Vera Bradley's net income of -$47M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Vera Bradley's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley is 0.14x versus 140.11x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -46.99% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of --. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -26.98% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Vera Bradley has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 131.21%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vera Bradley has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Vera Bradley is more attractive than Northann.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.758, which suggesting that the stock is 75.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vera Bradley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vera Bradley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vera Bradley quarterly revenues are $100M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Vera Bradley's net income of -$47M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Vera Bradley's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.33x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vera Bradley is 0.14x versus 0.73x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.