WKHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envirotech Vehicles has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -92.9%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Envirotech Vehicles's return on equity of -65.84%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 49.25%. On the other hand Envirotech Vehicles has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5728.48%. Given that Envirotech Vehicles has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Envirotech Vehicles is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.987, which suggesting that the stock is 198.662% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envirotech Vehicles has a beta of 2.730, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.992%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envirotech Vehicles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envirotech Vehicles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Envirotech Vehicles quarterly revenues of $812.8K. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is lower than Envirotech Vehicles's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envirotech Vehicles's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.44x versus 2.05x for Envirotech Vehicles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of --. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of --.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 49.25%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8648549.51%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.987, which suggesting that the stock is 198.662% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of --. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of --. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.44x versus 56.36x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -169.41%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 49.25%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.55 which suggests that it could grow by 12.04%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.987, which suggesting that the stock is 198.662% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.44x versus 6.90x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volcon has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -1267.68%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Volcon's return on equity of --.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 49.25%. On the other hand Volcon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 71999972%. Given that Volcon has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Volcon is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.987, which suggesting that the stock is 198.662% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volcon has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volcon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volcon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Volcon quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is lower than Volcon's net income of -$13.6M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Volcon's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.44x versus 0.07x for Volcon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.