BRBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 4.33% compared to Blue Ridge Bankshares's net margin of 16.32%. Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -7.9% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 19.65%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays -8.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues are $21.8M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of $946K is lower than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Blue Ridge Bankshares's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Ridge Bankshares is 1.28x versus 2.76x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 4.33% compared to Blue Ridge Bankshares's net margin of 32.77%. Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -7.9% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 14.69%.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.13%. Given that OptimumBank Holdings has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe OptimumBank Holdings is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays -8.96% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues are $21.8M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.1M. Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of $946K is lower than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Blue Ridge Bankshares's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Ridge Bankshares is 1.28x versus 1.09x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 4.33% compared to Blue Ridge Bankshares's net margin of 27.77%. Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -7.9% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.02%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays -8.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues are $21.8M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of $946K is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Blue Ridge Bankshares's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park National's PE ratio is 20.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Ridge Bankshares is 1.28x versus 5.58x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 4.33% compared to Blue Ridge Bankshares's net margin of 24.66%. Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -7.9% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.55%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.471%.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays -8.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues are $21.8M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of $946K is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Blue Ridge Bankshares's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Ridge Bankshares is 1.28x versus 3.26x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.