FSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Medical Properties Trust has a net margin of -79.08% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of -52.85%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -9.97% beat Medical Properties Trust's return on equity of -29.59%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.23%. On the other hand Medical Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $5.43 which suggests that it could grow by 6.86%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Medical Properties Trust, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Medical Properties Trust.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.664% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medical Properties Trust has a beta of 1.417, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.659%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Medical Properties Trust offers a yield of 10.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -7.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Medical Properties Trust pays out -13.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Medical Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $223.8M. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$21.4M is higher than Medical Properties Trust's net income of -$118.3M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Medical Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.33x versus 3.22x for Medical Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of -79.08% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of 27.71%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -9.97% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.45%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.23%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $118.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Prologis.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.664% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.051%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -7.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$21.4M is lower than Prologis's net income of $593M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prologis's PE ratio is 26.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.33x versus 11.89x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of -79.08% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of 28.77%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -9.97% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.23%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.16 which suggests that it could grow by 10.05%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Regency Centers.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.664% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.729%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -7.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $380.9M. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$21.4M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 33.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.33x versus 8.92x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of -79.08% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of 10.8%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -9.97% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.46%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.23%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $165.45 which suggests that it could grow by 9.93%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Welltower.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.664% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.67%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -7.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$21.4M is lower than Welltower's net income of $258M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Welltower's PE ratio is 86.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.33x versus 11.23x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.