INLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amdocs has a net margin of -1.26% compared to Intellinetics's net margin of 13.62%. Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34% beat Amdocs's return on equity of 13.99%.

Intellinetics has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.62%. On the other hand Amdocs has an analysts' consensus of $101.61 which suggests that it could grow by 22.01%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Amdocs, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Amdocs.

Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amdocs has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.422%.

Intellinetics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amdocs offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Intellinetics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amdocs pays out 42.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Amdocs's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intellinetics quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Amdocs quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K is lower than Amdocs's net income of $151.1M. Notably, Intellinetics's price-to-earnings ratio is 248.75x while Amdocs's PE ratio is 19.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intellinetics is 3.12x versus 1.93x for Amdocs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Katapult Holdings has a net margin of -1.26% compared to Intellinetics's net margin of -14.74%. Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34% beat Katapult Holdings's return on equity of --.

Intellinetics has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.62%. On the other hand Katapult Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 38.16%. Given that Katapult Holdings has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe Katapult Holdings is more attractive than Intellinetics.

Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.025%.

Intellinetics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Katapult Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intellinetics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Katapult Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intellinetics quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues of $60.3M. Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K is higher than Katapult Holdings's net income of -$8.9M. Notably, Intellinetics's price-to-earnings ratio is 248.75x while Katapult Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intellinetics is 3.12x versus 0.13x for Katapult Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -1.26% compared to Intellinetics's net margin of -2893.73%. Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Intellinetics has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.62%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intellinetics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intellinetics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intellinetics quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Intellinetics's price-to-earnings ratio is 248.75x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intellinetics is 3.12x versus 0.58x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -1.26% compared to Intellinetics's net margin of -1.23%. Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Intellinetics has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.62%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 147.15%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Intellinetics.

Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.

Intellinetics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intellinetics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intellinetics quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Intellinetics's price-to-earnings ratio is 248.75x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intellinetics is 3.12x versus 0.18x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.