PTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -2357.27% compared to Palatin Technologies's net margin of -49.65%. Palatin Technologies's return on equity of -- beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Palatin Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1652.58%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 620.92%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals.

Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.383%.

Palatin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palatin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues are $350K, which are smaller than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Palatin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palatin Technologies is -- versus 0.06x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nanoviricides has a net margin of -2357.27% compared to Palatin Technologies's net margin of --. Palatin Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Nanoviricides's return on equity of --.

Palatin Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1652.58%. On the other hand Nanoviricides has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 324.84%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Nanoviricides, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Nanoviricides.

Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nanoviricides has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.355%.

Palatin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nanoviricides offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palatin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nanoviricides pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues are $350K, which are larger than Nanoviricides quarterly revenues of --. Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M is lower than Nanoviricides's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Palatin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nanoviricides's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palatin Technologies is -- versus -- for Nanoviricides. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of -2357.27% compared to Palatin Technologies's net margin of --. Palatin Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

Palatin Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1652.58%. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24523.8%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Palatin Technologies, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Palatin Technologies.

Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.551%.

Palatin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palatin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues are $350K, which are larger than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M is lower than Oragenics's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Palatin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palatin Technologies is -- versus 1.44x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -2357.27% compared to Palatin Technologies's net margin of --. Palatin Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Palatin Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1652.58%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $100.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6861.54%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Palatin Technologies, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Palatin Technologies.

Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.874%.

Palatin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palatin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues are $350K, which are larger than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M is lower than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Palatin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palatin Technologies is -- versus 0.90x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.