ABG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 1.71%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.82% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $273.14, signalling upside risk potential of 19.65%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $483.56 which suggests that it could grow by 19.4%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 1.043, which suggesting that the stock is 4.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.09%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $128.8M is higher than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.27x versus 0.27x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 2.36%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.82% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.36%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $273.14, signalling upside risk potential of 19.65%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $427.63 which suggests that it could grow by 46.66%. Given that Lithia Motors has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Lithia Motors is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 1.043, which suggesting that the stock is 4.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.889%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 7.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $128.8M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $216.2M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 9.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.27x versus 0.22x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 3.06%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.82% beat Penske Automotive Group's return on equity of 18.34%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $273.14, signalling upside risk potential of 19.65%. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group has an analysts' consensus of $172.82 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Penske Automotive Group, analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group is more attractive than Penske Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 1.043, which suggesting that the stock is 4.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.403%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penske Automotive Group offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group pays out 29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $128.8M is lower than Penske Automotive Group's net income of $236.4M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Penske Automotive Group's PE ratio is 11.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.27x versus 0.33x for Penske Automotive Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonic Automotive has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 1.5%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.82% beat Sonic Automotive's return on equity of 22.42%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $273.14, signalling upside risk potential of 19.65%. On the other hand Sonic Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $77.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.72%. Given that Sonic Automotive has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Sonic Automotive is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 1.043, which suggesting that the stock is 4.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonic Automotive has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.707%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sonic Automotive offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive pays out 18.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Sonic Automotive quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $128.8M is higher than Sonic Automotive's net income of $58.6M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Sonic Automotive's PE ratio is 9.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.27x versus 0.15x for Sonic Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.