AIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 19.91%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.20, signalling upside risk potential of 41.3%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $223.74 which suggests that it could grow by 7.72%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

AAR has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.227%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 32.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.75x versus 5.70x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 16.3%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.66%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.20, signalling upside risk potential of 41.3%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of $208.25 which suggests that it could fall by -0.57%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Heico.

AAR has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.566%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1B. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Heico's net income of $168M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while Heico's PE ratio is 51.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.75x versus 7.36x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loar Holdings has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 8.36%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.20, signalling upside risk potential of 41.3%. On the other hand Loar Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $94.75 which suggests that it could grow by 0.16%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Loar Holdings, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Loar Holdings.

AAR has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Loar Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Loar Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are larger than Loar Holdings quarterly revenues of $103.5M. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while Loar Holdings's PE ratio is 385.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.75x versus 21.35x for Loar Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 4.63%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.20, signalling upside risk potential of 41.3%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $23.72 which suggests that it could fall by -6.87%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Triumph Group.

AAR has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.156%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are larger than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $315.6M. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 3.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.75x versus 1.59x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.