AIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of -4.46% compared to AAR's net margin of 17.56%. AAR's return on equity of 0.89% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.69%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $208.89 which suggests that it could grow by 4.03%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

AAR has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.359%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AAR quarterly revenues are $686.1M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. AAR's net income of -$30.6M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 251.29x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 33.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.97x versus 4.81x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of -4.46% compared to AAR's net margin of 13.78%. AAR's return on equity of 0.89% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.04%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.69%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.63%. Given that Heico has higher upside potential than AAR, analysts believe Heico is more attractive than AAR.

AAR has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.068%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $686.1M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1B. AAR's net income of -$30.6M is lower than Heico's net income of $139.7M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 251.29x while Heico's PE ratio is 52.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.97x versus 6.93x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of -4.46% compared to AAR's net margin of 9.49%. AAR's return on equity of 0.89% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.69%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $559.61 which suggests that it could grow by 10.53%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

AAR has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.791%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $686.1M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. AAR's net income of -$30.6M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 251.29x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.97x versus 1.69x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of -4.46% compared to AAR's net margin of 4.13%. AAR's return on equity of 0.89% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

AAR has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.69%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $18.92 which suggests that it could fall by -0.4%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Triumph Group.

AAR has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.549%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AAR quarterly revenues are $686.1M, which are larger than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $287.5M. AAR's net income of -$30.6M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $11.9M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 251.29x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 2.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.97x versus 1.21x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.